TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment outcomes of prostate cancer patients with Gleason score 8–10 treated with definitive radiotherapy
T2 - TROD 09-001 multi-institutional study
AU - Ozyigit, Gokhan
AU - Onal, Cem
AU - Igdem, Sefik
AU - Alicikus, Zumre Arican
AU - Iribas, Ayca
AU - Akin, Mustafa
AU - Yalman, Deniz
AU - Cetin, Ilknur
AU - Aksu, Melek Gamze
AU - Atalar, Banu
AU - Dincbas, Fazilet
AU - Hurmuz, Pervin
AU - Guler, Ozan Cem
AU - Aydin, Barbaros
AU - Sert, Fatma
AU - Yildirim, Cumhur
AU - Gorken, Ilknur Birkay
AU - Agaoglu, Fulya Yaman
AU - Korcum, Aylin Fidan
AU - Yuce, Deniz
AU - Ozkok, Serdar
AU - Darendeliler, Emin
AU - Akyol, Fadil
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Purpose: To validate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with Gleason score (GS) 8–10 disease treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the modern era. Methods: Institutional databases of biopsy proven 641 patients with GS 8–10 PCa treated between 2000 and 2015 were collected from 11 institutions. In this multi-institutional Turkish Radiation Oncology Group study, a standard database sheet was sent to each institution for patient enrollment. The inclusion criteria were, T1–T3N0M0 disease according to AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) 2010 Staging System, no prior diagnosis of malignancy, at least 70 Gy total irradiation dose to prostate ± seminal vesicles delivered with either three-dimensional conformal RT or intensity-modulated RT and patients receiving ADT. Results: The median follow-up time was 5.9 years (range 0.4–18.2 years); 5‑year overall survival (OS), biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were 88%, 78%, and 79%, respectively. Higher RT doses (≥78 Gy) and longer ADT duration (≥2 years) were significant predictors for improved DMFS, whereas advanced stage was a negative prognosticator for DMFS in patients with GS 9–10. Conclusions: Our results validated the fact that oncologic outcomes after radical EBRT significantly differ in men with GS 8 versus those with GS 9–10 prostate cancer. We found that EBRT dose was important predictive factor regardless of ADT period. Patients receiving ‘non-optimal treatment’ (RT doses <78 Gy and ADT period <2 years) had the worst treatment outcomes.
AB - Purpose: To validate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with Gleason score (GS) 8–10 disease treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the modern era. Methods: Institutional databases of biopsy proven 641 patients with GS 8–10 PCa treated between 2000 and 2015 were collected from 11 institutions. In this multi-institutional Turkish Radiation Oncology Group study, a standard database sheet was sent to each institution for patient enrollment. The inclusion criteria were, T1–T3N0M0 disease according to AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) 2010 Staging System, no prior diagnosis of malignancy, at least 70 Gy total irradiation dose to prostate ± seminal vesicles delivered with either three-dimensional conformal RT or intensity-modulated RT and patients receiving ADT. Results: The median follow-up time was 5.9 years (range 0.4–18.2 years); 5‑year overall survival (OS), biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were 88%, 78%, and 79%, respectively. Higher RT doses (≥78 Gy) and longer ADT duration (≥2 years) were significant predictors for improved DMFS, whereas advanced stage was a negative prognosticator for DMFS in patients with GS 9–10. Conclusions: Our results validated the fact that oncologic outcomes after radical EBRT significantly differ in men with GS 8 versus those with GS 9–10 prostate cancer. We found that EBRT dose was important predictive factor regardless of ADT period. Patients receiving ‘non-optimal treatment’ (RT doses <78 Gy and ADT period <2 years) had the worst treatment outcomes.
KW - Androgen deprivation therapy
KW - Grading system
KW - Hormonal treatment
KW - Intensity modulated radiation therapy
KW - Pelvic radiotherapy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85071184712
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=performanshacettepe&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000511421900003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1007/s00066-019-01476-z
DO - 10.1007/s00066-019-01476-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 31143994
AN - SCOPUS:85071184712
SN - 0179-7158
VL - 195
SP - 882
EP - 893
JO - Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
JF - Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
IS - 10
ER -