Ana gezinime atla Aramaya atla Ana içeriğe atla

Physiotherapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis across Europe: Regions and other factors that matter

  • Patrícia Martinková
  • , Jenny Freeman
  • , Adéla Drabinová
  • , Elena Erosheva
  • , Davide Cattaneo
  • , Johanna Jonsdottir
  • , Ilse Baert
  • , Tori Smedal
  • , Anders Romberg
  • , Peter Feys
  • , Jose Alves-Guerreiro
  • , Mario Habek
  • , Thomas Henze
  • , Carme Santoyo Medina
  • , Antonie Beiske
  • , Paul Van Asch
  • , Daphne Bakalidou
  • , Yeliz Salcı
  • , Erieta Nikolikj Dimitrova
  • , Markéta Pavlíková
  • Kamila Řasová
  • Czech Academy of Sciences
  • University of Plymouth
  • Charles University
  • University of Washington
  • IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi - Milano
  • Hasselt University
  • University of Bergen
  • Masku Neurological Rehabilitation Centre
  • Polytechnic Institute of Leiria
  • University of Zagreb
  • Rehabilitations-klinik für Neurologie-Geriatrie-Urologie
  • Neurology-Neuroimmunology Department & Neurorehabilitation Unit. Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat) Pg. Vall d′Hebron
  • Nevrologgruppen Oslo. Lillegrensen 7
  • Fit Up
  • University of West Attica
  • SS Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje

Araştırma sonucu: Dergiye katkıMakalebilirkişi

24 Alıntılar (Scopus)

Özet

Background: A wide variety of interventions exists in physical therapy (PT), but knowledge about their use across different geographical regions is limited. This study investigated the use of PT interventions in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) across Europe. It aimed to determine whether regions differ in applying interventions, and explore whether factors other than regions play a role in their use. Methods: In an online cross-sectional survey, 212 respondents from 115 European workplaces providing PT services to people with MS representing 26 countries (four European regions) participated. Cluster analysis, Pearson Chi-squared test and a Poisson regression model were used to analyze the data. Results: Thirteen of 45 listed PT interventions were used by more than 75% of centers, while nine interventions were used by less than 25%. For 12 interventions, regions differed markedly in their use. Cluster analysis of centers identified four clusters similar in their intervention use. Cluster assignment did not fully align with regions. While center region was important, center size, number and gender of physical therapists working in the center, and time since qualification also played a role. Cluster analysis exploring the use of the interventions provided the basis for a categorization of PT interventions in line with their primary focus: 1. Physical activity (fitness/endurance/resistance) training; 2. Neuroproprioceptive “facilitation/inhibition”; 3. Motor/skill acquisition (individualized therapy led); 4. Technology based interventions. Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first study that has explored this topic in MS. The results broaden our understanding of the different PT interventions used in MS, as well as the context of their use.

Orijinal dilİngilizce
Sayfa (başlangıç-bitiş)59-67
Sayfa sayısı9
DergiMultiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Hacim22
DOI'lar
Yayın durumuYayınlandı - May 2018

Parmak izi

Physiotherapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis across Europe: Regions and other factors that matter' araştırma başlıklarına git. Birlikte benzersiz bir parmak izi oluştururlar.

Bundan alıntı yap