TY - JOUR
T1 - Is there a risk of developmental problems in infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus and/or pre-eclampsia?
AU - Yardımcı-Lokmanoğlu, Bilge Nur
AU - Topal, Yusuf
AU - Kınacı-Biber, Esra
AU - Arıkan, Zeynep
AU - Sırtbaş-Işık, Gülsen
AU - Porsnok, Doğan
AU - Çelik, Hasan Tolga
AU - Mutlu, Akmer
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Yardımcı-Lokmanoğlu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were (i) to describe the early spontaneous movements in 3-to 5-month-old infants in groups of infants born to mothers with GDM and/or PE, (ii) to compare them, and (iii) to analyze the differences between infants with these risk factors and typically developing infants born to mothers without GDM and/or PE and other risk factors.METHODS: This cohort study included 255 infants in 4 groups: (i) 96 infants born to mothers with GDM, (ii) 78 infants born to mothers with PE, (iii) 31 infants born to mothers with GDM and PE, and (iv) 50 typically developing infants. Early spontaneous movements, including not only fidgety movements but also concurrent movement and postural patterns, were assessed using the General Movements Assessment (GMA), which determines the Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R). Comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA for normally distributed continuous variables, Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed data, and Pearson chi-squared for categorical variables. Univariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).RESULTS: There were no differences between the three groups, which included infants whose mothers had at least one of these risk factors (p>0.05). Infants born to mothers with GDM, infants born to mothers with PE, and infants born to mothers with both GDM and PE had more aberrant fidgety movements, reduced age-adequate movement repertoire, and more abnormal postural patterns than typically developing infants (p<0.05), in addition to lower MOS-R. When looking at those with ≤24 in MOS-R, the odds ratios were ≥2.74.CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that early spontaneous movements, GMA, may play a crucial role in understanding developmental outcomes of these infants and in determining infants who need early intervention.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were (i) to describe the early spontaneous movements in 3-to 5-month-old infants in groups of infants born to mothers with GDM and/or PE, (ii) to compare them, and (iii) to analyze the differences between infants with these risk factors and typically developing infants born to mothers without GDM and/or PE and other risk factors.METHODS: This cohort study included 255 infants in 4 groups: (i) 96 infants born to mothers with GDM, (ii) 78 infants born to mothers with PE, (iii) 31 infants born to mothers with GDM and PE, and (iv) 50 typically developing infants. Early spontaneous movements, including not only fidgety movements but also concurrent movement and postural patterns, were assessed using the General Movements Assessment (GMA), which determines the Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R). Comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA for normally distributed continuous variables, Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed data, and Pearson chi-squared for categorical variables. Univariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).RESULTS: There were no differences between the three groups, which included infants whose mothers had at least one of these risk factors (p>0.05). Infants born to mothers with GDM, infants born to mothers with PE, and infants born to mothers with both GDM and PE had more aberrant fidgety movements, reduced age-adequate movement repertoire, and more abnormal postural patterns than typically developing infants (p<0.05), in addition to lower MOS-R. When looking at those with ≤24 in MOS-R, the odds ratios were ≥2.74.CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that early spontaneous movements, GMA, may play a crucial role in understanding developmental outcomes of these infants and in determining infants who need early intervention.
KW - Adult
KW - Child Development
KW - Cohort Studies
KW - Developmental Disabilities/etiology
KW - Diabetes, Gestational/physiopathology
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Infant
KW - Infant, Newborn
KW - Male
KW - Movement
KW - Pre-Eclampsia/physiopathology
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Risk Factors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85216428408
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=performanshacettepe&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001466879700168&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0318003
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0318003
M3 - Article
C2 - 39854575
AN - SCOPUS:85216428408
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 20
SP - e0318003
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 1 January
M1 - e0318003
ER -