TY - JOUR
T1 - International expert Delphi consensus on management of early and locally advanced rectal cancer
AU - On behalf of TSCRS Study Group
AU - Tatar, Cihad
AU - Bisgin, Tayfun
AU - Canda, Aras Emre
AU - Karakayali, Feza
AU - Gecim, Ethem
AU - Yildirim, Ali Cihat
AU - Cetinkaya, Erdinc
AU - Cakcak, Ibrahim Ethem
AU - Ozata, Ibrahim H.
AU - Koc, Mehmet Ali
AU - Aydin, Huseyin Onur
AU - Bozbiyik, Osman
AU - Kozan, Ramazan
AU - Sevim, Yusuf
AU - Erenler Bayraktar, Ilknur
AU - Bemelman, Willem
AU - Hohenberger, Werner
AU - Erol, Timucin
AU - Leventoglu, Sezai
AU - Kim, Seon Hahn
AU - Sokmen, Selman
AU - Perez, Rodrigo
AU - Paty, Philip
AU - Tsarkov, Petr
AU - Sylla, Patricia
AU - Isik, Ozgen
AU - Okkabaz, Nuri
AU - Sengul, Neriman
AU - Smart, Neil
AU - Samalavicius, Narimantas
AU - ONCEL, Mustafa
AU - Adamina, Michel
AU - Keskin, Metin
AU - Ozmen, Mehmet Mahir
AU - Kuzu, Mehmet Ayhan
AU - Eray, Ismail Cem
AU - Sucullu, Ilker
AU - Inan, Ihsan
AU - Gecim, Ibrahim Ethem
AU - Cengiz, Fevzi
AU - Gultekin, Fatma Ayca
AU - Acar, Fahrettin
AU - Ozturk, Ersin
AU - Aytac, Erman
AU - Akgun, Erhan
AU - Kamer, Erdinc
AU - Gorgun, Emre
AU - Balik, Emre
AU - Espin-basany, Eloy
AU - Altinli, Ediz
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Purpose: Treatment strategies for early and locally advanced rectal cancer are evolving, particularly with the increasing use of non-operative management and multidisciplinary decision-making. The aim of this study is to establish an expert-based consensus on the preferred treatment strategies for early and locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: A 12-member steering committee was established to conduct a modified Delphi consensus process on rectal cancer management. The committee performed a systematic literature review (2014–2024) to inform survey development. A 49-question survey, including open-ended and multiple-choice items, was developed and refined. A panel of 44 colorectal surgery experts was selected based on academic contributions, and two Delphi rounds were conducted anonymously. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Based on panel responses, 29 consensus statements were formulated. Results: The panel reached consensus on the importance of multidisciplinary evaluation and surgical expertise in total mesorectal excision. Structured MRI reporting was recommended. Total neoadjuvant therapy was preferred for high-risk tumors. Non-operative management was recommended in cases of clinical complete response, with defined surveillance strategies. The role of biopsy in near-complete responders was also addressed. Conclusions: This international consensus provides structured guidance on the management of rectal cancer, emphasizing multidisciplinary planning, the role of total neoadjuvant therapy in organ preservation, and rigorous surveillance protocols in non-operative management. These recommendations aim to standardize care and support evidence-informed clinical decision-making.
AB - Purpose: Treatment strategies for early and locally advanced rectal cancer are evolving, particularly with the increasing use of non-operative management and multidisciplinary decision-making. The aim of this study is to establish an expert-based consensus on the preferred treatment strategies for early and locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: A 12-member steering committee was established to conduct a modified Delphi consensus process on rectal cancer management. The committee performed a systematic literature review (2014–2024) to inform survey development. A 49-question survey, including open-ended and multiple-choice items, was developed and refined. A panel of 44 colorectal surgery experts was selected based on academic contributions, and two Delphi rounds were conducted anonymously. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Based on panel responses, 29 consensus statements were formulated. Results: The panel reached consensus on the importance of multidisciplinary evaluation and surgical expertise in total mesorectal excision. Structured MRI reporting was recommended. Total neoadjuvant therapy was preferred for high-risk tumors. Non-operative management was recommended in cases of clinical complete response, with defined surveillance strategies. The role of biopsy in near-complete responders was also addressed. Conclusions: This international consensus provides structured guidance on the management of rectal cancer, emphasizing multidisciplinary planning, the role of total neoadjuvant therapy in organ preservation, and rigorous surveillance protocols in non-operative management. These recommendations aim to standardize care and support evidence-informed clinical decision-making.
KW - Clinical complete response
KW - Consensus
KW - Multidisciplinary team
KW - Non-operative management
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - Total neoadjuvant therapy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021843466
U2 - 10.1007/s00384-025-05011-8
DO - 10.1007/s00384-025-05011-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 41231265
AN - SCOPUS:105021843466
SN - 0179-1958
VL - 40
JO - International Journal of Colorectal Disease
JF - International Journal of Colorectal Disease
IS - 1
M1 - 231
ER -