Ana gezinime atla Aramaya atla Ana içeriğe atla

Evaluation and Selection of Indicators for Land Degradation and Desertification Monitoring: Methodological Approach

  • C. Kosmas
  • , Or Kairis
  • , Ch Karavitis
  • , C. Ritsema
  • , L. Salvati
  • , S. Acikalin
  • , M. Alcalá
  • , P. Alfama
  • , J. Atlhopheng
  • , J. Barrera
  • , A. Belgacem
  • , A. Solé-Benet
  • , J. Brito
  • , M. Chaker
  • , R. Chanda
  • , C. Coelho
  • , M. Darkoh
  • , I. Diamantis
  • , O. Ermolaeva
  • , V. Fassouli
  • W. Fei, J. Feng, F. Fernandez, A. Ferreira, C. Gokceoglu, D. Gonzalez, H. Gungor, R. Hessel, J. Juying, H. Khatteli, N. Khitrov, A. Kounalaki, A. Laouina, P. Lollino, M. Lopes, L. Magole, L. Medina, M. Mendoza, P. Morais, K. Mulale, F. Ocakoglu, M. Ouessar, C. Ovalle, C. Perez, J. Perkins, F. Pliakas, M. Polemio, A. Pozo, C. Prat, Y. Qinke, A. Ramos, J. Ramos, J. Riquelme, V. Romanenkov, L. Rui, F. Santaloia, R. Sebego, M. Sghaier, N. Silva, M. Sizemskaya, J. Soares, H. Sonmez, H. Taamallah, L. Tezcan, D. Torri, F. Ungaro, S. Valente, J. de Vente, E. Zagal, A. Zeiliguer, W. Zhonging, A. Ziogas
  • Agricultural University of Athens
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • Italian National Council for Agricultural Research
  • Osmangazi University
  • Institut de recherche pour le développement
  • National Institute for Agriculture Research and Development
  • University of Botswana
  • Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias - Ministerio de Agricultura, Chile
  • Institut des Régions Arides
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EEZA-CSIC)
  • Mohammed V University in Rabat
  • University of Aveiro
  • Democritus University of Thrace
  • Moscow State University of Environmental Engineering
  • CAS - Institute of Soil and Water Conservation
  • Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra
  • Research Institute for Hydrogeological Protection

Araştırma sonucu: Dergiye katkıMakalebilirkişi

127 Alıntılar (Scopus)

Özet

An approach to derive relationships for defining land degradation and desertification risk and developing appropriate tools for assessing the effectiveness of the various land management practices using indicators is presented in the present paper. In order to investigate which indicators are most effective in assessing the level of desertification risk, a total of 70 candidate indicators was selected providing information for the biophysical environment, socio-economic conditions, and land management characteristics. The indicators were defined in 1,672 field sites located in 17 study areas in the Mediterranean region, Eastern Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia. Based on an existing geo-referenced database, classes were designated for each indicator and a sensitivity score to desertification was assigned to each class based on existing research. The obtained data were analyzed for the various processes of land degradation at farm level. The derived methodology was assessed using independent indicators, such as the measured soil erosion rate, and the organic matter content of the soil. Based on regression analyses, the collected indicator set can be reduced to a number of effective indicators ranging from 8 to 17 in the various processes of land degradation. Among the most important indicators identified as affecting land degradation and desertification risk were rain seasonality, slope gradient, plant cover, rate of land abandonment, land-use intensity, and the level of policy implementation.

Orijinal dilİngilizce
Sayfa (başlangıç-bitiş)951-970
Sayfa sayısı20
DergiEnvironmental Management
Hacim54
Basın numarası5
DOI'lar
Yayın durumuYayınlandı - Kas 2013
Harici olarak yayınlandıEvet

BM SKH

Bu sonuç, aşağıdaki Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefine/Hedeflerine katkıda bulunur

  1. SKH 15 - Karasal Yaşam
    SKH 15 Karasal Yaşam

Parmak izi

Evaluation and Selection of Indicators for Land Degradation and Desertification Monitoring: Methodological Approach' araştırma başlıklarına git. Birlikte benzersiz bir parmak izi oluştururlar.

Bundan alıntı yap