TY - JOUR
T1 - Atezolizumab in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Have Progressed After First-line Chemotherapy
T2 - Results of Real-life Experiences
AU - Tural, Deniz
AU - Ölmez, Ömer Fatih
AU - Sümbül, Ahmet Taner
AU - Artaç, Mehmet
AU - Özhan, Nail
AU - Akar, Emre
AU - Çakar, Burcu
AU - Köstek, Osman
AU - Ekenel, Meltem
AU - Erman, Mustafa
AU - Coşkun, Hasan Şenol
AU - Selçukbiricik, Fatih
AU - Keskin, Özge
AU - Türköz, Fatma Paksoy
AU - Oruç, Kerem
AU - Bayram, Selami
AU - Yılmaz, Uğur
AU - Bilgetekin, İrem
AU - Yıldız, Birol
AU - Şendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit
AU - Paksoy, Nail
AU - Dirican, Ahmet
AU - Erdem, Dilek
AU - Selam, Meltem
AU - Tanrıverdi, Özgür
AU - Paydaş, Semra
AU - Urakçı, Zuhat
AU - Atağ, Elif
AU - Güncan, Sabri
AU - Ürün, Yüksel
AU - Alkan, Ali
AU - Kaya, Ali Osman
AU - Özyükseler, Deniz Tataroğlu
AU - Taşkaynatan, Halil
AU - Yıldırım, Mustafa
AU - Sönmez, Müge
AU - Başoğlu, Tuğba
AU - Gündüz, Şeyda
AU - Kılıçkap, Saadettin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 European Association of Urology
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Background: Atezolizumab (ATZ) has demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in previous studies in patients with locally advanced or metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma. Objective: To compare the real-life experience and data of clinical trials on ATZ treatment in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Design, setting, and participants: Patients with urothelial cancer treated with ATZ after progression on first-line chemotherapy from an expanded access program were retrospectively studied. Data of patients were obtained from their files and hospital records. Safety was evaluated for patients treated with at least one cycle of ATZ. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, and safety profile of patients. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate median follow-up and estimate PFS and OS. Results and limitations: Data of 115 enrolled patients were analyzed. Most of the patients (92.3%, n = 106) had received chemotherapy regimen only once prior to ATZ. The median follow-up duration was 23.5 mo. The complete response rate, partial response rate, and ORR were 8.7% (n = 10), 20.0% (n = 23), and 28.7% (n = 33), respectively. The median duration of response was 20.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.47–28.8). Of the 33 patients who responded to treatment, 60% (n = 20) had an ongoing response at the time of the analysis. PFS and OS with ATZ were 3.8 mo (95% CI, 2.25–5.49) and 9.8 mo (95% CI, 6.7–12.9), respectively. All-cause and any-grade adverse events were observed in 113 (98%) patients. Of the patients, 64% experienced a treatment-related adverse event of any grade and 24 (21.2%) had a grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse event. Limitations of the study included its retrospective design, and determination of treatment response based on clinical notes and local radiographic studies. Conclusions: In these real-life data, ATZ was effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. ATZ is an effective and tolerable treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma in our study, similar to previously reported trials. Patient summary: Atezolizumab is effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who progressed with first-line chemotherapy, consistent with the outcomes of the previous clinical trials in this setting.
AB - Background: Atezolizumab (ATZ) has demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in previous studies in patients with locally advanced or metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma. Objective: To compare the real-life experience and data of clinical trials on ATZ treatment in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Design, setting, and participants: Patients with urothelial cancer treated with ATZ after progression on first-line chemotherapy from an expanded access program were retrospectively studied. Data of patients were obtained from their files and hospital records. Safety was evaluated for patients treated with at least one cycle of ATZ. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, and safety profile of patients. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate median follow-up and estimate PFS and OS. Results and limitations: Data of 115 enrolled patients were analyzed. Most of the patients (92.3%, n = 106) had received chemotherapy regimen only once prior to ATZ. The median follow-up duration was 23.5 mo. The complete response rate, partial response rate, and ORR were 8.7% (n = 10), 20.0% (n = 23), and 28.7% (n = 33), respectively. The median duration of response was 20.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.47–28.8). Of the 33 patients who responded to treatment, 60% (n = 20) had an ongoing response at the time of the analysis. PFS and OS with ATZ were 3.8 mo (95% CI, 2.25–5.49) and 9.8 mo (95% CI, 6.7–12.9), respectively. All-cause and any-grade adverse events were observed in 113 (98%) patients. Of the patients, 64% experienced a treatment-related adverse event of any grade and 24 (21.2%) had a grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse event. Limitations of the study included its retrospective design, and determination of treatment response based on clinical notes and local radiographic studies. Conclusions: In these real-life data, ATZ was effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. ATZ is an effective and tolerable treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma in our study, similar to previously reported trials. Patient summary: Atezolizumab is effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who progressed with first-line chemotherapy, consistent with the outcomes of the previous clinical trials in this setting.
KW - Atezolizumab
KW - Bladder cancer
KW - Immunotherapy
KW - Urothelial carcinoma
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85091877719
U2 - 10.1016/j.euf.2020.09.010
DO - 10.1016/j.euf.2020.09.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 33008789
AN - SCOPUS:85091877719
SN - 2405-4569
VL - 7
SP - 1061
EP - 1066
JO - European Urology Focus
JF - European Urology Focus
IS - 5
ER -