Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Treatment outcomes of prostate cancer patients with Gleason score 8–10 treated with definitive radiotherapy: TROD 09-001 multi-institutional study

  • Gokhan Ozyigit
  • , Cem Onal
  • , Sefik Igdem
  • , Zumre Arican Alicikus
  • , Ayca Iribas
  • , Mustafa Akin
  • , Deniz Yalman
  • , Ilknur Cetin
  • , Melek Gamze Aksu
  • , Banu Atalar
  • , Fazilet Dincbas
  • , Pervin Hurmuz
  • , Ozan Cem Guler
  • , Barbaros Aydin
  • , Fatma Sert
  • , Cumhur Yildirim
  • , Ilknur Birkay Gorken
  • , Fulya Yaman Agaoglu
  • , Aylin Fidan Korcum
  • , Deniz Yuce
  • Serdar Ozkok, Emin Darendeliler, Fadil Akyol
  • Baskent University
  • Istanbul Bilim University
  • Dokuz Eylul University
  • Istanbul University
  • Balikesir State Hospital
  • Ege University
  • Marmara University
  • Akdeniz University
  • Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar Universitesi
  • Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa
  • Hacettepe University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To validate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with Gleason score (GS) 8–10 disease treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the modern era. Methods: Institutional databases of biopsy proven 641 patients with GS 8–10 PCa treated between 2000 and 2015 were collected from 11 institutions. In this multi-institutional Turkish Radiation Oncology Group study, a standard database sheet was sent to each institution for patient enrollment. The inclusion criteria were, T1–T3N0M0 disease according to AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) 2010 Staging System, no prior diagnosis of malignancy, at least 70 Gy total irradiation dose to prostate ± seminal vesicles delivered with either three-dimensional conformal RT or intensity-modulated RT and patients receiving ADT. Results: The median follow-up time was 5.9 years (range 0.4–18.2 years); 5‑year overall survival (OS), biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were 88%, 78%, and 79%, respectively. Higher RT doses (≥78 Gy) and longer ADT duration (≥2 years) were significant predictors for improved DMFS, whereas advanced stage was a negative prognosticator for DMFS in patients with GS 9–10. Conclusions: Our results validated the fact that oncologic outcomes after radical EBRT significantly differ in men with GS 8 versus those with GS 9–10 prostate cancer. We found that EBRT dose was important predictive factor regardless of ADT period. Patients receiving ‘non-optimal treatment’ (RT doses <78 Gy and ADT period <2 years) had the worst treatment outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)882-893
Number of pages12
JournalStrahlentherapie und Onkologie
Volume195
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Androgen deprivation therapy
  • Grading system
  • Hormonal treatment
  • Intensity modulated radiation therapy
  • Pelvic radiotherapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment outcomes of prostate cancer patients with Gleason score 8–10 treated with definitive radiotherapy: TROD 09-001 multi-institutional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this