Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: A Turkish gynecologic oncology group study (TRSGO-SLN-001)

  • Salih Taşkln
  • , Duygu Altin
  • , Dogan Vatansever
  • , Nedim Tokgozoglu
  • , Emine Karabük
  • , Hasan Turan
  • , Özgüç Takmaz
  • , Ilker Kahramanoglu
  • , Mehmet Murat Naki
  • , Mete Güngör
  • , Faruk Köse
  • , Firat Ortac
  • , MacIt Arvas
  • , Ali Ayhan
  • , Cagatay Taskiran
  • Ankara University
  • Koc University
  • Ministry of Health, Turkey
  • Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar Universitesi
  • Istanbul Education and Research Hospital
  • Diyarbaklr Education and Research Hospital
  • Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa
  • Baskent University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the feasibility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in clinically uterine confined endometrial cancer. Methods Patients who underwent primary surgery for endometrial cancer with an SLN algorithm were reviewed. Indocyanine green or blue dye was used as a tracer. SLNs and/or suspicious lymph nodes were resected. Side specific lymphadenectomy was performed when mapping was unsuccessful. SLNs were ultrastaged on final pathology. Results 357 eligible patients were analyzed. Median age was 59 years. Median number of resected SLNs was 2 (range 1-12) per patient. Minimal invasive and open surgeries were performed in 264 (73.9%) and 93 (26.1%) patients, respectively. Indocyanine green was used in 231 (64.7%) and blue dye in 126 (35.3%) patients. The dyes were injected into the cervix in 355 (99.4%) patients. The overall and bilateral SLN detection rates were 91.9% and 71.4%, respectively. The mapping rates using indocyanine green or blue dye were comparable (P=0.526). There were 43 (12%) patients with lymphatic metastasis. The SLN algorithm was not able to detect 3 of 43 patients who had isolated paraaortic metastasis. After SLN biopsy, complete pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 286 (80.1%) patients. Sensitivity and negative predictive value were both 100% for the detection of pelvic lymph node metastases. In addition, 117 (32.8%) patients underwent completion paraaortic lymphadenectomy after SLN biopsy. In these patients, sensitivity for detecting metastases to pelvic and/or paraaortic lymph nodes was 90.3% with a negative predictive value of 96.6%. The risk of non-SLN involvement in patients with macrometastatic SLNs, micrometastatic SLNs, and isolated tumor cells in SLNs were 61.2%, 14.3% and 0%, respectively. Conclusions SLN biopsy had good accuracy in detecting lymphatic metastasis. However, one-third of cases with metastatic SLNs also had non-SLN involvement and this risk increased to two-thirds of cases with macrometastatic SLNs. The effect of leaving these nodes in situ on survival should be evaluated in further studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-304
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • endometrial neoplasms
  • lymphatic metastasis
  • sentinel lymph node

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: A Turkish gynecologic oncology group study (TRSGO-SLN-001)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this