Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predictive performance of current ground motion models for recorded strong motions in 2020 Samos Earthquake

  • Zeynep Gülerce
  • , Burak Akbaş
  • , A. Arda Özacar
  • , Eyüp Sopacı
  • , Fatih M. Önder
  • , Bora Uzel
  • , Gizem Can
  • , Elife Cakir
  • , Makbule Ilgaç
  • , Berkan Söylemez
  • , Nazlı Saltoğlu
  • , Aysegul Askan
  • , Kemal Onder Cetin
  • , Berna Unutmaz
  • Middle East Technical University
  • Dokuz Eylul University
  • Polytechnic University of Milan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 2020 M7.0 Samos earthquake had occurred on the north of Samos Island; however, structural damage was observed in İzmir-Bayraklı, which is located approximately 65 km away from the epicenter. Strong ground motions recorded in İzmir Bay showed unique site amplifications, mostly due to the interaction between the basin and deep alluvial deposit response. The objective of this study is to evaluate the predictive performance of current ground motion models (GMMs) for estimating the recorded strong motions, especially the recordings over or near the Bayraklı-Bornova basin. 66 strong motion stations from Turkey with rupture distance (RRUP) < 200 km are used in the residual analysis, considering the ambiguities in the magnitude and depth to the top of the rupture estimations. Event terms of the earthquake for tested GMMs are found to be small and lie within the expected scatter, except for T = 0.5–1.5 s spectral accelerations. Event-specific distance attenuation for RRUP<100 km is consistent with the median predictions of current GMMs; however, the distance scaling for 100 km<RRUP<200 km are significantly different at high frequencies, indicating faster attenuation for Southwestern Anatolia. Relatively long period (0.5–1.5 s) spectral energy is present in both soft sites on the Bayraklı-Bornova basin and rock/stiff-soil sites on the basin edge and these stations contribute significantly to the positive event terms at T = 0.5–1.5 s. For sites within the basin or close to the basin edge, factors such as the direction of the rupture front, basin width and depth, and the seismic structure of the basin contribute to the ground motion variability.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107053
JournalSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Volume152
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Keywords

  • 2020 Samos Earthquake
  • Basin effects
  • Data-driven testing
  • Ground motion models
  • Inelastic attenuation
  • Site amplification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictive performance of current ground motion models for recorded strong motions in 2020 Samos Earthquake'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this