Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Management of invasive candidal infections: Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study of fluconazole versus amphotericin B and review of the literature

  • Elias J. Anaissie
  • , Rabih O. Darouiche
  • , Dima Abi-Said
  • , Omrum Uzun
  • , Jorge Mera
  • , Layne O. Gentry
  • , Temple Williams
  • , Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis
  • , Cynthia L. Karl
  • , Gerald P. Bodey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

273 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing fluconazole and amphotericin B in the treatment of candidal infections. One hundred and sixty-four patients (60 of whom were neutropenic) with documented or presumed invasive candidiasis were assigned to treatment with either fluconazole (400 mg daily) or amphotericin B (25-50 mg daily; 0.67 mg/kg daily for neutropenic patients). Clinical response and survival rates were assessed at 48 hours, after 5 days, and at the end of therapy. Overall response rates to fluconazole and amphotericin B were similar (66% and 64%, respectively). There were no differences in response as related to site of infection, pathogen, time to defervescence, relapse, or survival rates between the groups. Adverse effects were more frequent with amphotericin B (35%) than with fluconazole (5%; P < .0001). The results of this study confirm that fluconazole is as effective as but better tolerated than amphotericin B in the treatment of candidal infections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)964-972
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management of invasive candidal infections: Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study of fluconazole versus amphotericin B and review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this