Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Final Results of the Randomized Phase II NorCap-CA223 Trial Comparing First-Line All-Oral Versus Taxane-Based Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

  • Saverio Cinieri
  • , Arlene Chan
  • , Kadri Altundag
  • , An Vandebroek
  • , Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu
  • , Agusti Barnadas
  • , Patricia Dodyk
  • , Silvia Lazzarelli
  • , Michiel Botha
  • , Daniel Rauch
  • , Gustavo Villanova
  • , Ugur Coskun
  • IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - Milano
  • Curtin University
  • Middelheim General Hospital
  • CHU de Limoges
  • Hospital Sant Pau
  • Instituto Medico CER
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Cremona
  • National Hospital Bloemfontein
  • Medical Oncology
  • Pierre Fabre
  • Gazi University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This randomized phase II trial compared first-line all-oral vinorelbine/capecitabine, gemcitabine/paclitaxel, and gemcitabine/docetaxel for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Disease control rates (primary end point) were 73%, 78%, and 80%, respectively; median progression-free survival was 7.6, 9.0, and 11.4 months; median overall survival was 30 to 31 months with all regimens. All-oral vinorelbine/capecitabine is an active first-line regimen, and avoids alopecia and frequent intravenous administrations. Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 first-line chemotherapy combination regimens for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Patients and Methods In this open-label, 3-arm, randomized phase II trial, patients were randomized to all-oral NORCAP (vinorelbine/capecitabine), GEMPAC (gemcitabine/paclitaxel), or GEMDOC (gemcitabine/docetaxel) as first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative mBC. Stratification factors were center, previous (neo)adjuvant anthracycline, and age. The primary end point was disease control rate (DCR; complete or partial response, or stable disease for ≥3 months). Results The DCR was 73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59-85) with NORCAP (36 of 49 patients), 78% (95% CI, 64-88) with GEMPAC (39 of 50 patients), and 80% (95% CI, 66-90) with GEMDOC (40 of 50 patients). Objective response rates were 33% (16 of 49 patients), 24% (12 of 50 patients), and 50% (25 of 50 patients), respectively; median progression-free survival was 7.6, 9.0, and 11.4 months, respectively. Median overall survival was 30 to 31 months with all regimens. The most common Grade ≥3 adverse event with each regimen was neutropenia (24 patients [50%], 23 patients [46%], and 43 patients [86%], respectively). The most common nonhematological Grade ≥3 adverse event was fatigue. Grade 2 alopecia occurred in 36 patients (72%) who received GEMPAC and 38 patients (76%) who received GEMDOC, but only 4 patients (8%) who received NORCAP. There was no evidence of a detrimental effect of NORCAP on quality of life. Conclusion All-oral NORCAP is an active first-line chemotherapy regimen and might be offered as an alternative to first-line taxane-based therapy for HER2-negative mBC, particularly if patients wish to avoid alopecia or frequent intravenous administrations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-99.e1
JournalClinical Breast Cancer
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Capecitabine
  • Combination chemotherapy
  • Oral chemotherapy
  • Oral vinorelbine
  • Taxane doublet

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Final Results of the Randomized Phase II NorCap-CA223 Trial Comparing First-Line All-Oral Versus Taxane-Based Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this