Abstract
Anyone who has visited a radiology department in another continent, country, or even city has likely noticed subtle differences in how things are done compared to their own department. Many procedures become so ingrained in daily practice that we rarely stop to question whether they are truly supported by evidence. One such procedure is intussusception reduction. In this paper, we review the literature, examine the best reduction technique and the risks associated with general anaesthesia and sedation, and offer the Abdominal Task Force’s opinion on this common but very variable procedure, based on the current available literature.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 260-268 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Pediatric Radiology |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2026 |
Keywords
- Anaesthesia
- Child
- Enema
- Fluoroscopy
- Hypnotics and sedatives
- Intussusception
- Ultrasonography
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'European society of paediatric radiology abdominal task force procedural recommendations for intussusception reduction: what’s the evidence?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver