Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Report of a joint Task Force—Second revision

  • Peter Y.K. Van den Bergh
  • , Pieter A. van Doorn
  • , Robert D.M. Hadden
  • , Bert Avau
  • , Patrik Vankrunkelsven
  • , Jeffrey A. Allen
  • , Shahram Attarian
  • , Patricia H. Blomkwist-Markens
  • , David R. Cornblath
  • , Filip Eftimov
  • , H. Stephan Goedee
  • , Thomas Harbo
  • , Satoshi Kuwabara
  • , Richard A. Lewis
  • , Michael P. Lunn
  • , Eduardo Nobile-Orazio
  • , Luis Querol
  • , Yusuf A. Rajabally
  • , Claudia Sommer
  • , Haluk A. Topaloglu
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • King’s College Hospital
  • CEBAM
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille
  • Patient Representative GBS/CIDP Foundation International
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Utrecht University
  • Aarhus University
  • Chiba University
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Milan
  • Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Würzburg
  • Yeditepe University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

424 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To revise the 2010 consensus guideline on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Methods: Seventeen disease experts, a patient representative, and two Cochrane methodologists constructed 12 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions regarding diagnosis and treatment to guide the literature search. Data were extracted and summarized in GRADE summary of findings (for treatment PICOs) or evidence tables (for diagnostic PICOs). Results: Statements were prepared according to the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. Typical CIDP and CIDP variants were distinguished. The previous term “atypical CIDP” was replaced by “CIDP variants” because these are well characterized entities (multifocal, focal, distal, motor, or sensory CIDP). The levels of diagnostic certainty were reduced from three (definite, probable, possible CIDP) to only two (CIDP and possible CIDP), because the diagnostic accuracy of criteria for probable and definite CIDP did not significantly differ. Good Practice Points were formulated for supportive criteria and investigations to be considered to diagnose CIDP. The principal treatment recommendations were: (a) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids are strongly recommended as initial treatment in typical CIDP and CIDP variants; (b) plasma exchange is strongly recommended if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective; (c) IVIg should be considered as first-line treatment in motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (d) for maintenance treatment, IVIg, subcutaneous immunoglobulin or corticosteroids are recommended; (e) if the maintenance dose of any of these is high, consider either combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug (Good Practice Point); and (f) if pain is present, consider drugs against neuropathic pain and multidisciplinary management (Good Practice Point).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3556-3583
Number of pages28
JournalEuropean Journal of Neurology
Volume28
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CIDP
  • GRADE
  • diagnosis
  • guideline
  • treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Report of a joint Task Force—Second revision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this