Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Energy expenditure and nutritional status of coal miners: A cross-sectional study

  • Saniye Bilici
  • , Fatma Saglam
  • , Yasemin Beyhan
  • , Banugul Barut-Uyar
  • , Derya Dikmen
  • , Zeynep Goktas
  • , A. James Attar
  • , Patrick Mucka
  • , M. Fatih Uyar
  • Gazi University
  • Hacettepe University
  • Halic University
  • Harvard University
  • North Carolina State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess the nutritional status, daily energy intake, and daily energy expenditure of coal miners in Turkey. A total of 135 healthy coal miners (aged 19–64 years) were evaluated. Heart rates were measured using Polar watches, and the total energy expenditure was calculated using physical activity level formula and Hiilloskorpi equation. The average body mass index of the participants was 25.7 ± 3.98 kg/m2, and the average energy intake was 3,973.7 ± 420.85 kcal. According to Dietary Reference Intakes, the energy and nutrient intakes of the miners were adequate, except for the intake of vitamin D. The coal miners were found to be at moderate (43.0%), heavy (41.5%), and very heavy (13.3%) activity levels. Calculations of the energy expenditure at work were found to be 2,189.8 ± 376.19 to 2,788.8 ± 359.89 kcal per day. Further studies have to be conducted for developing national standards for each occupation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-299
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Environmental and Occupational Health
Volume71
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Sept 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Coal miner
  • energy expenditure
  • heart rate
  • nutrition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Energy expenditure and nutritional status of coal miners: A cross-sectional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this