Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Emulating randomised clinical trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with non-randomised real-world evidence: An application using data from the MSBase Registry

  • Alessio Signori
  • , Marta Ponzano
  • , Tomas Kalincik
  • , Serkan Ozakbas
  • , Dana Horakova
  • , Eva Kubala Havrdova
  • , Raed Alroughani
  • , Francesco Patti
  • , Jens Kuhle
  • , Guillermo Izquierdo
  • , Sara Eichau
  • , Bassem Yamout
  • , Samia Joseph Khoury
  • , Rana Karabudak
  • , Pierre Grammond
  • , Pierre Duquette
  • , Izanne Roos
  • , Helmut Butzkueven
  • , Anneke Van Der Walt
  • , Maria Pia Sormani
  • University of Genoa
  • University of Melbourne, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • Dokuz Eylul University
  • Charles University
  • Al-Amiri Hospital
  • University of Catania
  • University of Basel
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
  • American University of Beirut
  • Hotel-Dieu de Levis Hospital
  • University of Montreal
  • Monash University
  • Alfred Health
  • University of Genoa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background To mimic as closely as possible a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and calibrate the real-world evidence (RWE) studies against a known treatment effect would be helpful to understand if RWE can support causal conclusions in selected circumstances. The aim was to emulate the TRANSFORMS trial comparing Fingolimod (FTY) versus intramuscular interferon β-1a (IFN) using observational data. Methods We extracted from the MSBase registry all the patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) collected in the period 2011-2021 who received IFN or FTY (0.5 mg) and with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria of the TRANSFORMS RCT. The primary endpoint was the annualised relapse rate (ARR) over 12 months. Patients were 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matched. Relapse-rate ratio (RR) was calculated by mean of a negative binomial regression. Results A total of 4376 patients with RRMS (1140 in IFN and 3236 in FTY) were selected. After PS, 856 patients in each group were matched. The ARR was 0.45 in IFN and 0.25 in FTY with a significant difference between the two groups (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.68; p<0.001). The result of the emulation was very similar and fell within the 95% CI of that observed in the RCT (RR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.64; p<0.001) with a standardised difference of 0.66 (p=0.51). Conclusions By applying the same inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the RCT and employing appropriate methodology, we successfully replicated the RCT results with only minor discrepancies. Also, even if the confounding bias cannot be fully eliminated, conducting a rigorous target trial emulation could still yield valuable insights for comparative effectiveness research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)620-625
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Volume95
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jun 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • epidemiology
  • multiple sclerosis
  • neuroepidemiology
  • randomised trials
  • statistics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emulating randomised clinical trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with non-randomised real-world evidence: An application using data from the MSBase Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this