Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic polypharmacy for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

  • Marc W.H. Lochmann van Bennekom
  • , Joanna IntHout
  • , Harm J. Gijsman
  • , Berna B.K. Akdede
  • , A. Elif Anıl Yağcıoğlu
  • , Thomas R.E. Barnes
  • , Britta Galling
  • , Ralitza Gueorguieva
  • , Siegfried Kasper
  • , Anatoly Kreinin
  • , Jimmi Nielsen
  • , René Ernst Nielsen
  • , Gary Remington
  • , Eila Repo-Tiihonen
  • , Christian Schmidt-Kraepelin
  • , Saeed S. Shafti
  • , Le Xiao
  • , Christoph U. Correll
  • , Robbert Jan Verkes
  • Pro Persona Mental Health Care
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Dimence Mental Healthcare
  • Dokuz Eylul University
  • Imperial College London
  • School of Medicine
  • Yale University
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • Ariel University
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Mental health service Capital Region Denmark
  • Aalborg University
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Eastern Finland
  • Kaiserswerther Diakonie
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
  • University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences
  • Capital Medical University
  • Northwell Health
  • Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
  • Northwell Health System
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Partner Site Berlin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) is frequently prescribed for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Despite the inconsistent findings on efficacy, APP may be beneficial for subgroups of psychotic patients. This meta-analysis of individual patient data investigated moderators of efficacy and tolerability of APP in adult patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Design: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Trials until September 1, 2022, for randomized controlled trials comparing APP with antipsychotic monotherapy. We estimated the effects with a one-stage approach for patient-level moderators and a two-stage approach for study-level moderators, using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models. Primary outcome was treatment response, defined as a reduction of 25 % or more in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score. Secondary outcomes were study discontinuation, and changes from baseline on the PANSS total score, its positive and negative symptom subscale scores, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), and adverse effects. Results: We obtained individual patient data from 10 studies (602 patients; 31 % of all possible patients) and included 599 patients in our analysis. A higher baseline PANSS total score increased the chance of a response to APP (OR = 1.41, 95 % CI 1.02; 1.94, p = 0.037 per 10-point increase in baseline PANSS total), mainly driven by baseline positive symptoms. The same applied to changes on the PANSS positive symptom subscale and the CGI severity scale. Extrapyramidal side effects increased significantly where first and second-generation antipsychotics were co-prescribed. Study discontinuation was comparable between both treatment arms. Conclusions: APP was effective in severely psychotic patients with high baseline PANSS total scores and predominantly positive symptoms. This effect must be weighed against potential adverse effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Volume272
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Antipsychotic polypharmacy
  • Effect moderators
  • Efficacy
  • Tolerability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic polypharmacy for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this