Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness analysis of leuprorelin acetate atrigel in the treatment of prostate cancer

  • Hacettepe University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost of leuprorelin acetate Atrigel (Eligard®) in prostate cancer treatment and calculate its cost-effectiveness compared with other luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists (leuprolide acetate microsphere [Lucrin®], goserelin [Zoladex LA®], and triptorelin [Decapeptyl®]). METHODS The primary health-related outcome was life-years gained, and effectiveness was measured through the difference between treatment options. Analyses were performed separately for testosterone suppression targets of <20 ng/dL and <50 ng/dL for disease risk groups (intermediate and high risk) and for disease periods (relapse-free, postrelapse, and postdistant metastasis). Only direct treatment costs were used for cost analyses. Resource utilization was estimated according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and expert opinion. RESULTS This study included 173 patients treated with definitive radiotherapy and maximal androgen blockade. The median follow-up duration was 125.37 (range 10.84-214.37) months. The percentages of patients whose testosterone levels decreased to <20 ng/dL and <50 ng/dL were higher with leuprorelin acetate Atrigel. Compared with leuprolide acetate microsphere, goserelin, and triptorelin, Leuprorelin acetate Atrigel provided cost savings of 8386.04 Turkish liras (TL), 3710.79 TL, and 8446.64 TL, respectively, in patients with testosterone levels of <20 ng/dL and 479.41 TL, 1142.13 TL, and 5490.79 TL, respectively, in patients with testosterone levels of <50 ng/dL. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that leuprorelin acetate Atrigel was superior to its comparators regarding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios at low-and high-sensitivity margins. CONCLUSION Leuprorelin acetate Atrigel was found to be clinically more effective and cost-saving than other LHRH agonists in the intermediate-and high-risk groups, regardless of testosterone suppression targets.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)430-437
Number of pages8
JournalTurk Onkoloji Dergisi
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cost-saving
  • Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist
  • Pharmacoeconomics
  • Testosterone suppression target

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness analysis of leuprorelin acetate atrigel in the treatment of prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this