Abstract
To investigate concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Information Processing Styles, 62 students majoring in social sciences evaluated the accuracy of the checklist in describing their dominant types. Each student had a friend who read the descriptions of the dominant type(s) of the student and rated their perceived accuracy of that categorization. Analyses indicated the inventory is reliable and valid.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 973-979 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Psychological Reports |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue number | 3 PART 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2000 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the information processing styles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver