Concordance of vestibular test batteries in patients with vestibular neuritis

  • Burak Kabiş
  • , Hakan Tutar
  • , Emre Gürses
  • , Bülent Gündüz
  • , Songül Aksoy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/aim: A growing number of vestibular function tests are utilized to differentiate and verify the diagnosis of vestibular neuritis. The aim of this study is to retrospectively investigate the consistency of the results of the objective vestibular test batteries in patients with a preliminary diagnosis of vestibular neuritis. Materials and methods: We reviewed a total of 37 adult patients (mean age: 39.03 ± 11.67, 19 females, 18 males) who met the inclusion criteria with a prediagnosis of vestibular neuritis from 379 patients suffering vestibular symptoms. Caloric test (CVT), video head impulse test (vHIT), and ocular and cervical VEMP tests were compared with Cohen’s kappa (Κ) analysis according to the likely affected part of the vestibular nerve. Results: The highest statistically significant K value was found between horizontal vHIT and ocular VEMP (K = 0.707; good grade, p < 0.05). All the tests compared with CVT were poorly in agreement (K = 0.288; 0.262; 0.256 for HvHIT, oVEMP, AvHIT, respectively, p < 0.05). Conclusion: VEMP and vHIT tests have prominent diagnostic value and agree with each other for detecting and differentiating the types of vestibular neuritis. Further studies should aim to include cutting-edge technologies such as functional HIT and ocular counter roll test.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1639-1645
Number of pages7
JournalTurkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Vestibular neuritis
  • inferior vestibular nerve
  • kappa analysis
  • superior vestibular nerve
  • vestibulo ocular reflex

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Concordance of vestibular test batteries in patients with vestibular neuritis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this