Abstract
This paper examines Aristotle's analysis of unenacted capacities to show the role they play in his discovery of the concept of actuality. I first argue that Aristotle begins Metaphysics IX by focusing on active and passive capacities, after which I discuss Aristotle's confrontation with the Megarians, the philosophers who maintain that a capacity is present only insofar as it is being enacted. Using Heidegger's interpretation as a guide, I show that Aristotle's rejection of the Megarian position leads him to propose that presence cannot be confined to activity. I also argue that this provides the context for Aristotle to realize that the relation between capacity and activity can be generalized as the relation between two ways of being.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 125-139 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Revue Roumaine de Philosophie |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Aristotle
- Heidegger
- Activity
- Actuality
- Capacity
- Potentiality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Aristotle, Heidegger, and the Megarians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver