Approach towards the right to be forgotten under turkish law in comparison with eu and us laws: A need for a reform?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study firstly analyses the general approaches of EU and US laws to the right to be forgotten. Then, basing on the right to be forgotten, a variety of dimensions from comparative law, court practice, doctrinal views and different legal sub-branches are considered from the aspect of Turkish law. Although there is no specific provision on the right to be forgotten in Turkish law, the right has been subject to doctrinal discussions from different perspectives. It is also referred to in court judgments, specifically when an individual wishes to erase certain news, data, etc. from the digital and/or non-digital archive so they can make a fresh start to a new life. Granting that person the right to be forgotten is in terms of protecting personality rights and privacy while acknowledging that these interests may compete with rights to press freedom and freedom of expression. After scrutinising the doctrinal view and court judgments, this study concludes that considering Turkish law, certain provisions should be enacted on the right to be forgotten to ensure uniform interpretation and clarify the definition and conditions of application.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-202
Number of pages29
JournalJuridical Tribune
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Freedom of expression and press
  • Freedom of protection of personality rights and reputation
  • Protection of personal data
  • Right to be forgotten
  • Right to erasure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Approach towards the right to be forgotten under turkish law in comparison with eu and us laws: A need for a reform?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this