Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Adjuvant Treatment Approaches after Radical Prostatectomy with Lymph Node Involvement

  • Hasan Hüseyin Tavukçu
  • , Oğuzcan Erbatu
  • , Bülent Akdoğan
  • , Volkan İzol
  • , Uğur Yücetaş
  • , Sinan Sözen
  • , Güven Aslan
  • , Bahadır Şahin
  • , İlker Tinay
  • , Talha Müezzinoğlu
  • , Sümer
  • University of Health Sciences
  • Manisa Celal Bayar University
  • Cukurova University
  • Ministry of Health, Turkey
  • Gazi University
  • Dokuz Eylul University
  • Marmara University
  • Anadolu Medical Center
  • Ankara University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adjuvant treatment preferences and effects on disease progression in patients with pathologically positive lymph node prostate cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from the prostate cancer database of the Turkish Urooncology Association with lymph node involvement were included in the study. Database includes prostate cancer patients from many experience Urooncology centers of Turkey. Adjuvant treatment approaches and the factors that effect the PSA recurrrence was analysed. Results: Postoperative median 2 (1-3) lymph nodes were found to be positive, and the median lymph node density was reported as 0.13 (0.07-0.25). Seventy-four percent of patients received adjuvant treatment postoperatively. Seventy four of the patients (46.54%) received hormonal therapy in combination with radiotherapy; 47 of them (29.55%) received only hormonal treatment and 20(12.57%) only received radiotherapy. The number of lymph nodes removed was less in the group requiring adjuvant treatment, and this group had a higher rate of surgical margin positivity and seminal vesicle invasion. In addition, adjuvant treatment group had a statistically significant higher lymph node density. There was no significant difference in Kaplan-Meier method comparing 5-year PSA recurrence-free survival in patients with and without adjuvant therapy. When the patient clustered as non-adjuvant, only hormonal therapy and hormonal therapy with radiotherapy, a significant survival advantage was found in the hormonal therapy with radiotherapy group compared to the other two groups (p=0.043). Conclusion: No significant difference was found between two groups in terms of time until PSA recurrence during our follow-up. In subgroup analysis survival advantage was found in the hormonal therapy with radiotherapy group compared to non-adjuvant and only hormonal therapy groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2279-2284
Number of pages6
JournalAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Volume23
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Adjuvant
  • Lymph node metastases
  • Pelvic lymph node dissection
  • Prostate cancer
  • Radical prostatectomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adjuvant Treatment Approaches after Radical Prostatectomy with Lymph Node Involvement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this