A generic method for the evaluation of interval type-2 fuzzy linguistic summaries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Linguistic summarization has turned out to be an important knowledge discovery technique by providing the most relevant natural language-based sentences in a human consistent manner. While many studies on linguistic summarization have handled ordinary fuzzy sets [type-1 fuzzy set (T1FS)] for modeling words, only few of them have dealt with interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FS) even though IT2FS is better capable of handling uncertainties associated with words. Furthermore, the existent studies work with the scalar cardinality based degree of truth which might lead to inconsistency in the evaluation of interval type-2 fuzzy (IT2F) linguistic summaries. In this paper, to overcome this shortcoming, we propose a novel probabilistic degree of truth for evaluating IT2F linguistic summaries in the forms of type-I and type-II quantified sentences. We also extend the properties that should be fulfilled by any degree of truth on linguistic summarization with T1FS to IT2F environment. We not only prove that our probabilistic degree of truth satisfies the given properties, but also illustrate by examples that it provides more consistent results when compared to the existing degree of truth in the literature. Furthermore, we carry out an application on linguistic summarization of time series data of Europe Brent Spot Price, along with a comparison of the results achieved with our approach and that of the existing degree of truth in the literature.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6678169
Pages (from-to)1632-1645
Number of pages14
JournalIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
Volume44
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Data mining
  • interval type-2 fuzzy set
  • linguistic summarization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A generic method for the evaluation of interval type-2 fuzzy linguistic summaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this