Abstract
The clinical efficacy of procaine penicillin and sulbactam-ampicillin was compared in patients with peritonsillar abscesses after peroral abscess drainage. Forty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive either procaine penicillin or sulbactam-ampicillin intramuscularly on an outpatient basis. The mean time required for clinical symptoms (throat pain, dysphagia and fever) to resolve was compared. No statistically significant difference was found between the clinical recoveries of patients using either antibiotic (P > 0.05). The authors conclude that intramuscular procaine penicillin can be safely prescribed on an outpatient basis to most patients with peritonsillar abscess after incision and drainage. In contrast, a broader spectrum and more expensive antibiotic, such as sulbactam-ampicillin, should be reserved for non-responders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 163-165 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology |
| Volume | 255 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1998 |
Keywords
- Peritonsillar abscess
- Procaine penicillin G
- Sulbactam-ampicillin
- Treatment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of procaine penicillin with sulbactam-ampicillin in the treatment of peritonsillar abscesses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver